data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08a85/08a85a3ba72f16ff3e82b9b7ecdeac294cb984ee" alt="Roger Ebert's Twenty Best Reviews Roger Ebert's Twenty Best Reviews"
He liked what he liked and eviscerated the things he did not. His show with Gene Siskel, an affable sort who played good cop to Ebert's bad, drew excellent ratings due, in part, to Ebert's sharp tongue.
Where Ebert really shined was in print. He was a writer's writer, a craftsman whose prose could snarl, dismember and disembowel.I learned to attend a movie first and then read his review - invariably I would love the movies he thought were average, and doze during ones over which he fawned.
I read him, nevertheless. He may have been a keen, insightful observer of the motion picture art form. His understanding of how to tell a story on the big screen might have been breathtaking. Maybe he was a great guy, or a prig. I don't have any way of knowing.
He was one hell of a writer, a giant.
No comments:
Post a Comment